Global Pulse Blog

Kaiser Family Foundation and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is holding a briefing on Thursday, January 5, 2012 at 9:30am at the Barbara Jordan Conference Center in Washington, D.C. to explore HHS’ role in global health and the emerging global health strategy. The event will explore the goals of the new strategy and the ways in which it fits with other U.S. global health objectives. If you are in the Washington, D.C. area, register online to attend.

As mentioned recently on the Global Pulse Blog, Research!America held a webcast briefing November 21st on USAID.  If you missed it, you can check out the panel discussion on the agency’s impact on global health research and development and partnerships in the global arena by clicking on the image below.

The panel was moderated by Susan Dentzer, Editor-in-Chief of Health Affairs, and included representatives from USAID and several global health R&D partners from the public and private sectors (representing Product Development Partnerships – or PDPs).

• Hugh Chang, Director of Special Initiatives, PATH
• Rick King, PhD, Vice President, Vaccine Design, IAVI
• Emily Moore, Vice President for Business Development, Temptime Corp.
• Wendy Taylor, Senior Advisor for Innovative Finance and Public Private Partnerships, Bureau of Global Health, USA

On Monday, Nov. 21^st 9:30am EST, Research!America will be webcasting a briefing on USAID and the agency’s impact on global health research and development.  The panel will be moderated by Susan Dentzer, Editor-in-Chief of Health Affairs, and will include representatives from USAID and several global health R&D partners from the public and private sectors (representing Product Development Partnerships – or PDPs).  Panelists include:

• Hugh Chang, Director of Special Initiatives, PATH
• Rick King, PhD, Vice President, Vaccine Design, IAVI
• Emily Moore, Vice President for Business Development, Temptime Corp.
• Wendy Taylor, Senior Advisor for Innovative Finance and Public Private Partnerships, Bureau of Global Health, USAI

The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) is marking its 50th anniversary as the main U.S. humanitarian relief and international development agency. This conversation regarding USAID and its global partenrs will shed insight into instrumental partnerships in global health work.

This important event will be webcast live at http://bit.ly/vWwx9o where you can also submit questions. You can also join the conversation on Twitter under the hashtag #GHPDP.

Global Health Technologies Coalition (GHTC) recently  interviewed prominent Americans and health officials about why Americans should care about global health. Below are some of the responses. Add your voice and share why you think global health research is important at GHTC’s blog.

Amie Batson on Why Americans Should Care about Global Health Research:

FDA Commissioner, Margaret Hamburg:

Representative Ed Markey (D-Mass):

Whoopi Goldberg:

Today’s guest blog post by Anand Reddi was originally published yesterday in The Huffington Post. Anand Reddi was a Fulbright Scholar in 2005, assisting the Sinikithemba HIV/AIDS clinic at McCord Hospital in Durban, South Africa. Currently, Mr. Reddi is a medical student at the University of Colorado, School of Medicine. Here, he reflects on Secretary Clinton’s speech earlier this week and the importance and potential of a Global Health Service Corp.

Stay tuned to Global Pulse Blog for more views on this monumental speech and its implications.

Yesterday, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton declared the U.S. government’s intent to create an “AIDS-free generation.” Secretary Clinton outlined a bold plan to reduce new HIV-infections, globally, including the eradication of pediatric HIV by 2015. This new strategy builds upon the success of the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), the U.S. program that addresses HIV/AIDS in resource-limited settings.

A notable feature of Secretary Clinton’s “AIDS-free generation” initiative is to strengthen healthcare systems in sub-Saharan Africa. Clinton stated:

“We know we can’t create an AIDS-free generation by dictating solutions from Washington. Our in-country partners — including governments, NGOs, and faith-based organizations — need to own and lead their nation’s response. So we are working with ministries of health and local organizations to strengthen their health systems so they can take on an even broader range of health problems.”

Strengthening African healthcare systems is a view echoed by many eminent voices in the global health community. Last year, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) of the National Academy of Sciences authored a report entitled: “Preparing for the Future of HIV/AIDS in Africa: A Shared Responsibility.” The IOM report recommended the urgent need to increase African healthcare workforce capacity to address the HIV epidemic.

I offer Secretary Clinton a solution to assist African healthcare workforces and ensure the success of the “AIDS-free generation” initiative. Last year, in an editorial in The New England Journal of Medicine, Vanessa Kerry, Sara Auld, and Paul Farmer reintroduced the idea of enacting a Global Health Service Corp (GHSC). The GHSC, compromised of U.S. healthcare professionals, would provide medical education and technical assistance to enhance the healthcare workforces in low-income countries. The GHSC’s goal would “go beyond that of filling a human resource void to focus on infrastructure development, knowledge transfer, and capacity building.” The GHSC could also offer partial student loan forgiveness for U.S. corps members who engage in service abroad for a specified time period similar to the loan forgiveness offered by the National Health Service Corp.

To address the African healthcare workforce shortage, I encourage Secretary Clinton to adopt the principles of the GHSC. The success of the “AIDS-free generation” initiative depends on the availability of skilled healthcare workers in African resource limited settings. Additionally, the eventual transition from a U.S. to African led HIV/AIDS response requires the U.S. to teach and train healthcare personnel in recipient countries through collaborative partnerships that eventually lead to African ownership of their domestic healthcare needs.

Some may argue that enacting the GHSC, especially in the era of U.S. government austerity measures, is not prudent. However, the funding for the GHSC already exists. In addition to HIV/AIDS prevention and treatment, PEPFAR’s congressional mandate requires the program to “strengthen partner government [healthcare] capacity to lead the response to this epidemic and other health demands.” Last year alone, PEPFAR committed over $734 million in healthcare capacity building initiatives.

Global health is the moral litmus test of our time. As Secretary Clinton asserted: “An AIDS-free generation would be one of the greatest gifts the United States could give to our collective future.” The U.S. should enact the GHSC to ensure the success and sustainability of the “AIDS-free generation” initiative.

-Anand Reddi, The Huffington Post

If you are interested in supporting the Global Health Service Corp please sign the petition to show your support. http://www.globalhealthservicecorps.org/index.php/petition/

Additionally, the Medical Student Section of the American Medical Association is considering a resolution endorsing the GHSC at its 2011 Interim Meeting in New Orleans, Louisiana.

Recently, ranking Minority Member Howard Berman released a draft of a revised Foreign Assistance Act (FAA) to take the place of the original legislation introduced by John F. Kennedy in 1961. At that time, Kennedy proposed such legislation to address the multitude of problems facing aid including the varied and numerous programs, short-term financing, overlapping jurisdictions and bureaucratic fragmentation. The reasons for modified legislation today are not so different. The proposed updated act would permit policymakers to come to an agreement about the priorities of the US when implementing foreign aid including adjustments to aid policy that would help it survive in the aftermath of the debt deal. The Center for Global Development recently also commented on the issue of why we need a new FAA.

The Kaiser Family Foundation will hold a live, interactive webcast tomorrow, Thursday April 21, 2011 at 11am EST on Congress and global health as part of their U.S. Global Health Policy: In Focus webcast series. This hour-long interactive session will feature three global health policy experts:

• Beth Tritter, Managing Director, The Glover Park Group; Former Legislative Director for Congresswoman Nita Lowey, Ranking Member of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on State and Foreign Operations.
• Todd Summers, Senior Advisor for Global Health, ONE Campaign.
• Allen Moore, Senior Advisor for Global Health Security Program, Stimson Center, and Adjunct Professor in Global Health, George Washington University; Former Deputy Chief of Staff and Policy Director for Former Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist.
• Jennifer Kates, Moderator, Vice President and Director, Global Health & HIV Policy, Kaiser Family Foundation.

They will examine the new legislative landscape of the 112th Congress and the ways in which recent changes will impact global health programs and foreign assistance.

You can watch the live studio webcast on kff.org. Viewers can also email questions before or during the live webcast at infocus@kff.org.

Kaiser Family Foundation recently held a webcast on “The Future of US Multilateral Engagement on Global Health“ as part of the Foundation’s US Global Health Policy: In Focus live webcast series. This question and answer format webcast featured an expert panel including Mark Abdoo the director for Global Health and Food Security, Natasha Bilimoria the president of Friends of the Global Fight Against AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria, and Jennifer Kates the vice president and director of Global Health Policy & HIV for the Kaiser Family Foundation, moderated by senior analyst Josh Michaud.

This discussion explores the approach taken by the United States to address Global Health funding historically and looking into the future. Discussions on global health funding often involve a division between bilateral approaches to funding versus multilateral funding engagement. Bilateral funding involves the provision of direct assistance from one government to, or for the benefit of, one or more other countries, with the donor having significant control over the target, approach and content of assistance. On the other hand, multilateral organizations such as the World Health Organization, the United Nations and the Global Fund, bring together global stakeholders to develop and collaborate on global health targets.

Historically, the US has commonly supported global health priorities via bilateral funding and programs but the focus on promoting multilateral organizations is growing. For example, the US was the first and is currently the largest donor to the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, and a key component of the Obama Administration’s Global Health Initiative includes a renewed and increased commitment to multilateral engagement. The shifting approach has led to questions regarding the appropriate focus for US global health engagement, the proper balance between multilateral and bilateral funding efforts and the appropriate role of the US government and other organizations in international treaties and other collaborative agreements.

Check out this and more global health-related webcasts and other valuable resources on global health policy at the http://www.kff.org/ website. A more detailed discussion on the US Government’s Global Health Policy Architecture is also available.

Recently members of several major corporations including Nike, EBay and the Modernizing Foreign Assistance Network (MFAN) presented an open letter calling on the US government and President Obama to take an innovative approach to carrying out the goals and visions committed to at the recent G8 summit and to develop a US global development strategy. They call on US leaders and Congress to develop a rewritten US development Act to replace the outdated 1961 Foreign Assistance Act. They discuss an approach to modernize foreign assistance in the global arena.

A  new survey from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) suggests that  heterosexuals living in impoverished communities are as much as five times more likely to be HIV-positive than the general U.S. population, regardless of race or ethnicity. In the US, the overall HIV prevalence rate for African Americans is eight times the rate for whites, and the rate for Latinos is three times the rate for whites. Yet in very-low income areas this CDC study found that these disparities do not exist. The study examined 9,000 people in 23 cities, finding that 2.1% of heterosexuals living in high-poverty urban areas were infected with the HIV virus, including 2.4% of those living below the poverty line and 1.2% of those living above it. This is in comparison to the 0.45% rate of HIV infection in the general US population. The authors hypothesize that the findings could account for many of the ethnic and racial disparities in HIV infections in this country, since African Americans are 4.5 times as likely and Latinos four times as likely as whites to live in poverty.